You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given diagrams demonstrates the amount of products conveyed in United States between 1974 and 2002 by four distinctive means of transport.
Overall, delivering products by road was the most prevalent means of transport among four modes, as opposed to the least-chosen mode, which was pipeline. It is also noticeable that the water and rail had the same starting point, which changed in the final with the higher position for water delivery.
Concerning the amount of products transported in the UK, in 1974, its figure started at about 70 million tons, after which saw a slightly decrease to approximately 65 million tons in the next 5 years. From 1985 onward, it started to rebound to 80 million tons, which then observed a consistent growth and finally reached a peak at around 90 million tons in the final year.
The remaining modes started the period lower with 40 million tons for the quantities of goods conveyed by water and rail and about 6 million tons for pipeline. After 5 years, the figre for the amount of products transported by water rose to 48 million tons and remained unchanged throughout the period of 10 years and ended with the record at 61 million tons. While the figure for rail witnessed a steady fluctuation from about 38 to 40 million tons and stayed untouched in the final year. Fot the least -chosen mode which was pipeline, started at 5 million tons, which grew minimally to about 21 million tons in1990 and finally declined slightly to 20 millions in 2020 which was double the figure of the first year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-21 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people have benefited from modern communications technology but some people have not benefited from it at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 67
- Today many people do not know their neighbors Why is this What can be done about this 73
- The diagram details the process of producing olive oil Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'pipelined'.
Suggestion: pipelined
...sed to the least-chosen mode, which was pipeline. It is also noticeable that the water a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'pipelined'.
Suggestion: pipelined
...r. Fot the least -chosen mode which was pipeline, started at 5 million tons, which grew ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 651, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: '20 million'
Suggestion: 20 million
...in1990 and finally declined slightly to 20 millions in 2020 which was double the figure of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83396226415 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5299459594 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.4160451484 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124220057348 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663856187735 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472492049999 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096160077663 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336158898094 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.