Nowadays, young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
In the modern society, idolization has become a predominant phenomenon amidst youngsters despite the fact that the admired sport celebrities are frequently observed to be poor role models. Consequently, the impacts of such admiration are widely discussed. From my perspective / point of view, whether that reality is beneficial or detrimental depends merely on how sport figures both instill inspiration and teach life lessons to the young generation.
From a positive perspective, young individuals’ reverence for extraordinary athletes is inclined to foster both their physical and mental advancement. First, renowned people with outstanding sport credentials tend to exhibit their competent skills and share their sporty habits on a regular basis, which induce significant concerns of the young towards a physically active lifestyle. To illustrate, the adolescents, especially male ones, are often prone to exercise in an attempt to emulate global superstars such as Ronaldo and Messi. It is undeniable that such additional activities not only enhance their physical health but also cultivate their sportsmanship and passion for sports. Moreover, in order to obtain success in their career, top sport athletes usually possess valuable qualifications like persistence, bravery, enthusiasm and industriousness, which are substantially advantageous for youngsters to learn.
Conversely, notwithstanding their talents, well-known sport figures often lean towards pursuing a materialistic lifestyle that is conceivably conducive to the moral standard infringement. For instance, a multitude of football players stemming from prestigious football clubs are widely witnessed to live up a depraved life with numerous overnight parties, or even utilize addictive substances like cocaine and morphine. Additionally, several sport celebrities are recorded to cheat in global sport competitions by abusing / employing prohibited stimulants. Due to their substantial praise from the young, these behaviors have exerted an extremely harmful influence on awareness of the adolescents.
To sum up, whilst youngsters’ admiration for sport stars has brought about some downsides under certain circumstances, its positive impacts are also explicitly displayed and acknowledged.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-31 | Celina Pei | 89 | view |
2023-06-22 | Mai Clover | 84 | view |
2023-03-27 | giangngoc | 56 | view |
2022-11-06 | giangngoc | 56 | view |
2021-12-15 | Blackcytrus | 84 | view |
- Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13522012579 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31537463711 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676100628931 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5453477122 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.076923077 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121024288862 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430222827235 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264649690083 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777247152574 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0154390650369 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.63 12.4159519038 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.