Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some individuals are of the claim that governments should allocate more expenditures on the search of terrestrial planets, the opponents of this initiative argue that such investment will be exorbitantly expensive and therefore more money should be diverted to solving other urgent issues. Although both schools of this thought hold merits, I agree with the latter due to the following explanations.
On the one hand, there are several reasons for the opinion that governments should distribute more national budgets to the search of terrestrial planets. Due to the exponential growth of global populations, our planet has become denser than ever, resulting in overpopulation that can exacerbate traffic congestion and other heated environmental issues. As a result, seeking another planet whose climatic and geographical conditions are suitable for humans has become an urgent action that governments across the globe should prioritize national budgets for.
On the other hand, the critics of the previous opinion claim that searching for terrestrial life is unnecessary due to concerns over financial waste and the necessity of other alarming social issues. Despite the prolonged expensive search of terrestrial planets that has been carried out for decades, scientists have not found any planet that reveals promising survival signals.
Therefore, some individuals argue that governments should allocate more money to building apartments to accommodate the rising population. If individuals are capable of purchasing homes at reasonable prices, they can be more dedicated at work and increase labour productivity, which will benefit the national economic growth.
In conclusion, although both schools of thought hold merits, I argue that governments should spend more money addressing urgent issues in the current world. The search for other planets often involves various complicated technologies and requires decades to detect a minor of survival. While searching terrestrial planets is exorbitantly expensive and has not achieved any outcomes, the investment in resolving social issues should get more attention.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-21 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-23 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- The maps below show how the town of Harbone changes from 1936 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 84
- Some people say free time activities for children should be organized by parents Others say that children should be free to choose what they do in their free time Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many people are travelling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...th schools of this thought hold merits, I agree with the latter due to the follow...
^
Line 8, column 62, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...gh both schools of thought hold merits, I argue that governments should spend mor...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79936305732 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96052469656 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.9603542922 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.75 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1951490926 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771887690858 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427433394948 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11340655179 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322603393196 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.