The advanced medical technology have a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
The enduring dissension in the public psyche is the medical technology advance growth is more important in human life expectancy. Besides, it has to look at whether medical research is a constructive or averse grunt on society. Opinion in people’s mind is the new medicine test is developing the region whilst others challenge research medicine to create issues. Here, I will explain my outlook by scrutinizing both sides of the argument.
To begin with dissent on medicine research, create a lot of side effects is all locals concocted a block in the area. For instance, because of taking the wrong pill given more side effects to my friend, there were a lot of discrepancies in the surrounding region. Still, the above investigation executes the people unhappy in this society.
The above disgust disturbed the public with negative thoughts since thee it will boost the advanced medical technology in human life is very important. Restored here is to show the new medicine is worth to cure the disease like cancer with an Endeavour to express and enhance. For example, cancer medicine cures an Indian cricketer to get out from the dangerous disease is the spirit to overcome society. So, key glance on advance medicine technology compensate a confirmatory stance, say and construe a diverse present up come to the people till again with prosperity.
The aforesaid carry the issue to the climax; which varied with the different moot which remains to a conflict in advanced medical technology in human life expectancy. Hence, for identifying the new disease and cure the people is possible only with advanced medical technology is a decisive entail that brings a sensed clash to upsurge my views without partiality to precise my prospect in no distress.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, look, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1107266436 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79168640945 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3379217238 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192553573595 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708900402165 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946528096947 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120597214988 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076063653218 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.