The advanced medical technology has a responsibility to human’s life expectancy. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that medical technology is responsible for increasing life expectancy. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain, why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that medical technology is responsible of increasing life expectancy can not contribute to increasing the level of human health, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only one can benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as aforementioned their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden and horizons, thus, learning such essential attribute as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of medical technology is responsible of increasing life expectancy .
In view of my arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of medical technology responsible of increasing life expectancy are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...esponsible of increasing life expectancy . In view of my arguments outlined above...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14341085271 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07171431125 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9259579488 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.636363636 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198887777566 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081166607144 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886586046096 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133479324791 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528047200655 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.