Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?
It is common to have an employer look down upon the employment of the older employee. Company management deems older employees as incapable of good performance and this results in unfair treatment such as unwarranted dismissals and frustrating them so that they leave the company. This essay will discuss why age discrimination in the workplace should be unlawful and punishable by law.
Unfair treatment of the workers in the senior age group comes in many forms, the manager will aim to frustrate them whenever a promotion should happen by not considering them for that opportunity. In addition to that, an employer will select them first whenever the company is conducting retrenchments during layoffs despite them being productive employees. Most employers consider senior workers as docile and unmotivated and instead opt to hire younger employees who they consider energetic and ambitious.
Employees who have been in the workforce for many years bring a lot of experience to the setup especially in technical areas and in the construction industry where operations are very mechanical. They are more driven as they have responsibilities and goals, unlike younger people who are yet to have families and loans. This reasoning by employers is ill-informed and very unfair. Furthermore, senior employees' can also play a good role in mentoring the incoming young employees which would increase their performance rate.
In conclusion, denying the senior workers opportunities in the workforce for advancements and treating them in an inconsiderate way should be punishable by law. In my opinion, the government and workers unions should enforce laws that protect the more experienced workers from unfair treatment from employers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 109, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inconsiderate way" with adverb for "inconsiderate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...orce for advancements and treating them in an inconsiderate way should be punishable by law. In my opin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, look, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1478.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49442379182 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04479349092 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6842462915 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.166666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134606608803 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539143351586 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518506238283 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840539326938 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454985961673 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.