Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Others believe that a woman’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. Which opinion do you agree with and why? Include specific details and examples to support your choice.
Traditionally, women's roles were in the kitchen and house chores in general. Their success was measured by how clean the house, children, and husband were or how well-fed the household was. Today, there is an ongoing debate about a needed change, that women should be allowed to get educated and find jobs and employ. Some people think that women should continue to focus on raising children, while others are open-minded and opine women should be liberated to choose alternative careers. This essay will discuss why women should explore educating themselves and exploring multiple career options.
In the world today, we have witnessed how talented women can be. For example, there are women astronauts, pilots, doctors, engineers, and mathematicians. These kinds of careers, require top-notch mental skills and can-do attitude. Therefore, denying women the opportunities to study is unfair and a disservice to this world because they are capable of changing our world for the better while still raising families. Additionally, when allowed to explore careers, they end up being wonderful role models to their children.
Despite, women having the capability to excel academically and in the workforce, some non-progressive humans are of the opinion that the woman's job is in the house. However, the economy these days is harsh and one income is not enough for a comfortable living any longer. It has become a necessity that everyone earns in order to afford food and upkeep as living costs have skyrocketed in the recent past.
Women's roles have changed to alternative careers while others still focus on raising families alone. In my opinion, women should have equal opportunities to study and explore various career choices and also given room to shine in these careers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'exploring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: exploring
...ng families. Additionally, when allowed to explore careers, they end up being wonderful ro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33098591549 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69401636258 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8433956758 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.933333333 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282035024703 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883691307771 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742028958471 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156067570168 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791318685187 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.