Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old

Essay topics:

Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older workers be made illegal?

Older workers are the key assets of an organization, with their age we earn their experience and knacks to deal in dire situations. Discrimination itself is profane on its own and neglecting someone on there age is insane to the society and its organizations. Let's delve into the essay below to debate on this topic.

Often we have come across policies of organization where we need to stay after hours to achieve our targets and meet customer expectaions, just to keep the sales growth ascending, just to keep the KPI above 99%, even just to cherish customer. Unfortunately we are in such a country that supports various other parts of globe across diffrent time zones. Organization, hence, need young and vibrant talents to work to the summit of their capacity and achive targets. Here kicks in the discremination rule to filter out the old and aged resources.

The process of filterring old resorces are well said to be age discrimination, but we are ignoring the moot quetion of the benifits they serve to the organization by their experiences and lessons learned so far. Companies should rather promote old workers to a diffrent domain where they can take the heat and share their profound knowledge, like traning, educating new resources, consultant, customer relationship managers. This will in return not only improvise customer relationship but will also bondage the customer loyalty. Finally the organization will be getting positive growth in all prospects.

Various commendable steps can be accounted to restore these old workers because it's an indispensable onus of the organization to look forward to those resources who took care of it in it's adolescence and provided growth.

Knowing organizations have stict rules and policies those are deemed to be followed, albiet these are for the benifit of the organization but ageing should not be the factor to stop talents and ideas. I concede that rather discarding someone because of there age we should reap knowledge and take benifits of their experience.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-09 njerime 80 view
2019-08-20 bashob 77 view
2019-07-21 Prince sapkota 55 view
2019-05-11 ahmedmemon_93 77 view
2019-04-08 Anil_PTE 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user bashob :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e to the society and its organizations. Lets delve into the essay below to debate on...
^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...will also bondage the customer loyalty. Finally the organization will be getting positi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, if, look, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 330.0 242.827586207 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93737043752 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2904042895 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21428571429 7.25397266985 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155636137687 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525554425255 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450294095206 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878386426108 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393219602106 0.0609392437508 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.