Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world. Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The implication of air travel can only richest people or ordinary people in the world, which has now gained further attention from numerous areanas. The sizeable influence for this subject has controversy over the potential impact of this trend. I believe that this idea is so good for the ordinary people and this will be further discussesd before reaching logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are diverse reasons, why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that the ordinary people eassy to go to another places and this can be contributing factor to that this is very good idea for instance, a researchable invariably show that this is so good. Therefore, the negative impact of cannot be denied.

Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and trend to believe that and this not good can be adressed with some position facets as well as there are innumerable facts in favor of that, but the most pre-dominant one stems from the fact that the ordinary people cannot be nuy the air travel tickets. As an illustraction, finding some studies reveal that. Hence, importance of this is undeniable.

The implication of air travel can only benefit the richest people or ordinary people in the world can be debated, but the fact remain that there were several factor lead to this theme and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that the air treval idea is not good for ordinary people.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-27 yasamin.gharib62 88 view
2019-08-30 Jaskaransingh11 70 view
2019-08-30 Ramanpreetsingh 70 view
2019-06-27 Prabhjot Sanghera 84 view
2019-01-31 Ahmed145 55 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial impact of this trend. I believe that this idea is so good for the ordinary pe...
^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.932 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63183282144 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.654159972 50.4703680194 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28394806164 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127879124822 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152641896854 0.071462118173 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211358801524 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118632955863 0.0609392437508 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.