The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far do you support this view? Give your response with justification?
Surely there has been no time in the history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals belching and unauthorized has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain whether it should be acceptable in modern office or not. I will elaborate this notion in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, workers face immense types of problems in offices. Firstly, belching is inappropriate method of releasing air from stomach and also not accepted in public places as well as work. As a case in point, after having a heavy lunch when workers release gases through their mouth, which have bad impacts on employees and disturb as well.
Probing further, it is must to have boned relationship between both employers and employees but some masses have unauthorized behavior in work department, who create plenty of problematic situations with workers and clients. Furthermore, harassment, bad manners and abusive language cause immense troubles in office, which ultimately halt the progress of a particular company or organization.
To conclude, I firmly believe that employers should made stringent rules and hefty fine for those employees who create these kinds of problematic situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...isturb as well. Probing further, it is must to have boned relationship between both em...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, so, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88877904636 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697115384615 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4640916905 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0888735651104 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352127018656 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333505438686 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.04494346928 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265454785349 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.