In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon?
These days there is an ongoing debate about the rise in using credits cards in a cashless society. while it is possible to claim we can measure some advantages and disadvantages which play vital roles in our daily life but still the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. This essay will analyze both points of views.
There are several reasons why using the credit cards is beneficial. One of them is credit cards in our cashless society are important, and they save us from being theft. It can also be argued that if the card gets lost by its owner at any place, it will be difficult for anybody else to use it without its password. It should also be taken into account that the savings in our bank account is safe from other hands.
Those who argue for not having cash money in our pockets and depend only on the credit cards have different view and they say that it can be harmful. Firstly, it is claimed that when we go to buy from local shop that does not have the credit machine, we have to pay only by cash. It should also be taken into account that there is some situation where cash is essential.
While there are strong arguments on both sides, my opinion is that the cashless society is perfect for those who need some security, but we cannot deny the importance of cash.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ng credits cards in a cashless society. while it is possible to claim we can measure ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47881355932 5.00649968141 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2358551844 2.71678728327 82% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572033898305 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0780230785 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0909090909 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150216588426 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635650400809 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580937120202 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955661912463 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806697546583 0.0609392437508 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.1260098522 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.5310837438 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.32886699507 87% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 55.0591133005 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.