As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
Expansion in cities have created an outgoing controversy which has raised a moot question whether government should create better networks for public transport for everyone rather than building or more roads for vehicle owning population. some advocates that it is positive development for the economy however, other opines to that. I will discuss the controversial aspects throughout the essay.
To commence with, there is myriad of reasons in favour of my stance however, most predominated one is there are few cities within the country which are yet not connected with the big cities. For example, a recent study done by the new york university demonstrates that more than 30% of the cities are yet not connected with major cities in new york. Consequently, natives for such region are still not have employment and industry in their area.
On the other hand, some people reject this notion and do take it as a positive development for the economy. government should look forward to creating proper road as many road accidents happens due to road digs every year. A salient example, a survey conducted by sydney university that more than 20% of people in sydney died due to unstructured roads every year. Hence, government should construct planned roads for the vehicle owners.
To conclude it, I pen down by saying that every garden has its own weeds. So, government should take strong decision while investing the public money in such projects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 55 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 80
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 65
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 80
- Is the study of music, art and sport as important for school children as becoming literate and numerate?" Do you agree or disagree. 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...re roads for vehicle owning population. some advocates that it is positive developme...
^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
...a positive development for the economy. government should look forward to creating proper ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, look, so, still, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10460251046 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61976146909 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615062761506 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6877012258 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397169323534 0.242375264174 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120947208165 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119554454011 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212090408812 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140124161541 0.0609392437508 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.