Recently, the phenomenon of imported food has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the advantage of impacting people's lives is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that positive impacts of imported food can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, importing various types of food can provide societies with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of having plenty of raw food, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between exporting frozen food and the nutritional quality. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of solving food crisis are visible.
From a scientific point of view, consuming imported food can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of vanishing food industries are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described the role of local agriculture development. Hence, the predicted outcomes of food importing systems are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of imported food in our lives far outweigh the drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of government's influences on citizen's diet prove the significance of the food-related economy, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6652892562 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20205275751 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623966942149 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3519423458 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.636363636 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262092488453 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930688024291 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401206600068 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149865697657 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042841634648 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.