Recently, the phenomenon of imported food has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the advantage of imported food impacts on people's life is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that positive impacts of imported food can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, importing food to the country can provide societies with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of having plenty of raw food, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between exporting frozen food and the nutritional quality. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of solving food crisis are visible.
From a scientific point of view, consuming imported food can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of vanishing food industries are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described the role of unemployment affected by less local agriculture. Hence, the predicted outcomes of being exerted by imported food are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of imported food in our lives far outweigh the drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of government's influences on citizen's diet prove the significance of living under the imported food fluxes, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57707509881 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14663234751 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6223700125 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.272727273 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29033170954 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10619290655 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462001550042 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165805574702 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456657152691 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57707509881 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14663234751 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6223700125 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.272727273 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29033170954 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10619290655 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462001550042 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165805574702 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456657152691 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.