With the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete University should provide digital material rather than textbooks Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view

Recently, the phenomenon of the library role in the universities has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the advantage of increasing online digital media is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that digital library materials can be a plus and I will investigate that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, procuring digital materials for the libraries can provide societies with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of accessing easily to the up-to-date materials, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between the number of the published papers and accessible digital materials. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of a modern library are visible.

From a scientific point of view, obsolete libraries can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of paper textbooks are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described the role of reading handwritten books. Hence, the predicted outcomes of not studying at the library are noticeable.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having a national library far outweigh the drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of preserving old books prove the significance of historical collections, but also pinpoint digitalized material implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71659919028 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24491338346 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623481781377 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8359462404 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.363636364 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349088656354 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103768006288 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573896681978 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178072511237 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064796684117 0.0609392437508 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.