Recently, the phenomenon of climate change has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question” how the climate change has affected our lives”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the climate change is really harmful. I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the ecological standpoint, the intensive fluctuations in temperature are bound up inextricably with the ecosystem deterioration, which indicates the lead to both industrial revolution and cosmopolitan areas. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between industry policies and industrial reforms as well as an exponential increase in the pollution rate. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to plants, animals, and the effect of warming alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the carbon footprint is positively correlated with not only the polar ice caps but also the internal the increase in sea-level.
Within the realm of industry, the climate change attributes to industrialization, in that it would come down to combustion engines, factories, and cars. A salient example of such attribution is air pollution, which is mistaken to take water pollution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the contamination process problems. Likewise, Hardly had they confined their attention to the greenhouse gases, the greenhouse effect, and even the hole in the ozone layer. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of fossil fuels.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes”all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above I firmly believe that cliamte change has extreme effect in global scales and deteriorates the quality of life for every creature.
- All examinations in some countries take place at the end of the academic year, but others spread out throughout an academic year's. Pros & Cons 88
- Advertisements influence people's behavior in a negative way. Do you agree or disagree with the statement. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?OrExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 85
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 11
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...te change has affected our lives'. Whereas it is a widely held view that the clima...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...goes'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, nevertheless, really, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73026315789 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36455756024 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664473684211 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9685166494 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.133333333 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256038112127 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761934673847 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144917127993 0.071462118173 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16202368114 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182684021819 0.0609392437508 300% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.