Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television.

Recently, the danger of Television for family life and sense of community has sparked an ongoing controversy, which leads to a moot question" why we must visit each other instead of watching television?". whereas it is a widely held view that the social relationship is beneficial, I discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.

From the sociological standpoint, amount of time which is dedicated to TV watching is bound up inextricably with being isolated, which indicates they both lead to personal and social disorders. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by an eminent scientist demonstrates the relationship between social happiness and well-being as well as an exponential increase in the overall prosperity statues. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the feel of convenience is correlated to not only being with others but also the collective wisdom.

Within the realm of personal aspects, without the slightest doubt, the bonds between family members are attributed to spending time together, in that it would come down to siblings, spouses affections, and the unbreakable bond among them. A salient example of such attribution is the conventional lifestyle of families, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take social media for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint relationship problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of family life.

To conclude, as for myself, as saying goes" all's well that ends well", after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that supporting other individuals is of the high importance.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
... instead of watching television?'. whereas it is a widely held view that the socia...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53136531365 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23475041463 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664206642066 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9945095084 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.9 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140642713753 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531256390647 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853967146217 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822655208795 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858715739457 0.0609392437508 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.