Recently, the danger of Television for family life and sense of community has sparked an ongoing controversy, which leads to a moot question" why we must visit each other instead of watching television?". whereas it is a widely held view that the social relationship is beneficial, I discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, amount of time which is dedicated to TV watching is bound up inextricably with being isolated, which indicates they both lead to personal and social disorders. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by an eminent scientist demonstrates the relationship between social happiness and well-being as well as an exponential increase in the overall prosperity statues. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of the feel of convinience is correlated to not only being with others but also the collective wisdom.
Within the realm of personal aspects, without the slightest doubt, the bonds between family members are attributed to spending time together, in that it would come down to sblings,spouses affections,and the unbreakable bond among them. A salient example of such attribution is the conventional lifestyle of families, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take social medias for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint relationship problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of family life.
To conclude, as for my self, as saying goes" all's well that ends well", after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmley belive that supporting other individuals is of the high importance.
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?OrExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 85
- All examinations in some countries take place at the end of the academic year, but others spread out throughout an academic year's. Pros & Cons 88
- Climate change? 88
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 11
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the Recently, The influence rate of televis...
^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...the impact factor of mass media and the individuals tendency to violence as well as an expo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62867647059 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32621044583 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669117647059 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1620340452 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.1 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0551111764538 0.242375264174 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0194438808686 0.0925447433944 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310743511372 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0347666203724 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036151018435 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.