Recently, the influence of advertisements on people's behavior has sparked an ongoing controversy that inadvertently leads to a moot question "whether this impact is positive or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that advertisements are beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, society's general wisdom is bound up inextricably with mass media, which indicates they lead to both better social relationship and more prosper personal life. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by an eminent scientist in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the amount of tendency toward purchasing luxurious items and severe financial problems as well as an exponential increase in the high rate in individuals in debt. Consequently, in fact, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of a sound lifestyle is correlated with not only being rational but also the ability to analyze the advertisements with cognition.
within the realm of business aspects, without the slightest doubt, the amount of advertisements in social media attributes to a better customer-retailer relationship, in that it would come down to productivity, efficacy, and a better socio quo. A salient example of such attribution is huge expenditures on advertisement broadcasting, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take wasting money for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint commercial problems of advertisement-oriented firms. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of advertisements.
to conclude, as for my self, as saying goes" all's well that ends well", after analyzing what elaborated above I firmly agree advertisements have had an intense impact on people's behavior and lifestyle.
- Advertisements influence people's behavior in a negative way. Do you agree or disagree with the statement. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?OrExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 85
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 11
- Climate change? 88
- Television is dangerous because of it destroys family life and any sense of community. Instead of visiting people or talking with our family we just watch television. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... this impact is positive or not?'. Whereas it is a widely held view that advertise...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...aspects of that throughout this essay. from the sociological standpoint, the genera...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Within
...yze the advertisements with cognition. within the realm of business aspects, without ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...er the pivotal role of advertisements. to conclude, as for my self, as saying goe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64084507042 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5834761516 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658450704225 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3959498433 50.4703680194 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.636363636 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167803154487 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554692414813 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548495736589 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100085758599 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406069846275 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.