combining education and work

Essay topics:

combining education and work

In this day and age, the phenomenon of effective learning and its corresponding effect has sparked heated controversy. Although contested by many that the mater of practical courses is highly profitable, such an issue is regarded both constructive and positive thoroughly by a considerable number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that theoretical courses can be a good point, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Initially, from a social viewpoint, combining study and employment can supply the society with some conspicuous impacts which are rooted in the fact that sophisticated students, as well as time management, are integrally bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I carried out an academic experiment that detected hard-working students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both peaceful studying and experienced pupils apparently can be seen.
Secondly, within the realm of science, only studying courses might escalate the consequences of time-consuming assignments. Furthermore, fundamental facets of laborious jobs could correlate with this reality that the demerits of complicated courses are associated with less effective assignments. To shed light on this point, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university has asserted that the downside of irrelevant jobs is negatively related to frustrated people. So it is true to assume the preconceived notion of a less comfortable lifestyle.
To make a long story short, while there are several convincing arguments on both sides, I deeply believe that the benefits of combining study and employment outnumber its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of part-time works prove the significance of being responsible, but also pinpoint better financial situation implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69516728625 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32234291402 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6522475051 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.666666667 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835265689223 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245393681038 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348716006034 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534375845001 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545504099193 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.