Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
Recently, the phenomenon of changing the ways of communication and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of considering face-to-face connection is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that easy contact can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the development of technology has changed communication in the last decade and it can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of easy connection, as well as using smartphones and a lot of communication apps, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered increasing the number of phone connections in the last years. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both easy-accessing to others and cutting-edge devices apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, preferring online or distant connections might increase the consequences of losing direct communication. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of hiding the real emotion by messaging could relate to this reality that the demerits of mental problems pertain to the sense of loneliness. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by UCLA University has asserted that there is a strong connection between feeling happy and gathering with friends and families. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of spending quality time with others.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of traditional ways of communication far outweigh their drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of having an enjoyable time prove the significance of real connections, but also pinpoint near contact implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 88 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 77 | view |
| 2021-06-30 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | NoPass | 80 | view |
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work but some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Discuss with examples or cases 80
- Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding 85
- Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect 85
- There are more negative impacts than the benefits of people using mobile devices Do you agree 88
- You need to study climate change Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56856187291 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34426420698 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638795986622 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0129127674 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154462226464 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449479590797 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584661002722 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0804971893485 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495961295571 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.