Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometime which they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice.
Surely there has no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. I quick reflection on the typical day reveals companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things which they don’t need has been one of the prominent topic in contemporary discussions. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain drawback regarding this and I would say to my view point in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, advertisements plays an essentials role in human life in which some advertisements are beneficial but some are not. Firstly, companies use advertisements to encourage masses to buy those things which they don’t use in daily life. People influence to buy those things which are not necessary so people have become more materialistic as well as it is the wastage of money. Moreover, people buy new things and throw their old things it lead to environmental pollution.
In addition to it, sometime companies use those advertisements which are useless and meaningless for human whereas people ignore those adverts and they are don’t prefer to see. This adverts can cause bad effects on companies budget and there is a wastage of time. Furthermore, companies have waste their money on unless advertisements.
In conclusion, useless advertisements influence people to buy those things which are not need for human it lead to bad effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pos;t need has been one of the prominent topic in contemporary discussions. Peopl...
^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'essentials'' or 'essential's'?
Suggestion: essentials'; essential's
... commence with, advertisements plays an essentials role in human life in which some advert...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 456, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...ew things and throw their old things it lead to environmental pollution. In additio...
^^^^
Line 4, column 90, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...eople to buy those things which are not need for human it lead to bad effects.
^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
... things which are not need for human it lead to bad effects.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2735426009 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10532855179 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529147982063 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9194448472 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.909090909 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467443047776 0.242375264174 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179482427572 0.0925447433944 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128409746326 0.071462118173 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297084886326 0.151781067708 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458320313801 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.