Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or Disagree.
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people changed dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day revels investment in arts, music and painting has been one of topics in the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain that reduce of investments by government in different activities.
To behind this, one of the main debate going in today's world is the decreasing the financial budget by the government for the development of fine arts including painting and music. The most preponderant fact is that these various forms of art are vital for the growth of nation, therefore, need government support to survive and thrive in the country. Not only music and painting induce discipline but can also give them chance to grow in this field nationally as well as internationally. Music is source of entertainment and cultural. Individuals have option then as a cause of opportunity. It is also source of cultural density. The unemployment can get job. Government should take care of unemployment peoples. Then they do hard work and become famous in our world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by government in different activities. To behind this, one of the main debate g...
^^
Line 2, column 605, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sourced'.
Suggestion: sourced
...n as a cause of opportunity. It is also source of cultural density. The unemployment c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 1207.87684729 79% => OK
No of words: 188.0 242.827586207 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08510638298 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.92707691288 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98331712652 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 379.143842365 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.5428177568 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.6666666667 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.25397266985 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.12807881773 48% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189855428514 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572666795086 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596889918884 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139271853877 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238318641428 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.