In the competition for consumerism, natural resources are fast depleting and run the risk of disappearing from the face of the Earth. What steps do you think governments and people should take to protect and preserve the natural resources?
Earth resources are finite and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. While some people think governments and people should take legal action to protect and preserve resources of the Earth, others believe that the Earth resources are infinite, so there is no need to be panic and preserving. This essay will discuss both views in detail with an example as well as from my own perspective.
To begin with, human are able to survive on the Earth, because Earth has provide human with everything they desire and require, but in return human are negatively and continuously affecting the ecosystem and biodiversity of the Earth, which results in various adverse problems. For instance, scientists have predicted that in the next few decades human will completely eradicate more than half tropical and rich forests of the Earth by cutting the trees and for agriculture practices. Therefore, governments must prohibit and put limitation on agriculture business including fish and farming to reduce the impact.
From a social standpoint, people are rapidly consuming and wasting food, and other materials of Earth. These people have disregarded the effects they are causing on the planet environment. As a tangible example, some scientist research undertaken by a MIT university has asserted that people wasting more than they are consuming. Therefore, governments and individuals should work together to spread the knowledge about how to preserve resources. In addition, greenhouse gas has dangerously affected the Earth atmosphere, which must be eliminated from the face of the Earth.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that ecofriendly organizations need to survey homes and schools to teach the benefits of preserving the Earth resources and its importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ss both views in detail with an example as well as from my own perspective. To begin with...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...survive on the Earth, because Earth has provide human with everything they desire and r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44561403509 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89543638544 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5705712687 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240102784065 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821201149376 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739973432213 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142323846419 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765858971086 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.