Nowadays Television has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some, it acts like a companion. What is your opinion
Television has presented people an innovative way to get information, and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. While some people think, television is a great and save source of entertainment and enjoyment, others believe that people are spending more time at home watching television rather than participating in social activities. I am inclined to maintain that the television has replaced the traditional methods of obtaining knowledge, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
To begin with, in the current era people are exhausted, and working overtime, so television has provided them a great deal of relaxation during weekends. Moreover, television has given young generation an opportunity to obtain knowledge and skills at a very low cost. For instance, Discovery tv channel has motivated many people worldwide to find their passion in multifarious fields including photography. Therefore, technology does not always have unoptimistic effects, but it can give people hope and knowledge.
From a social experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that many university students used television to entertain and relax themselves during leisure hours. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an organization has asserted that the invention of television has helped lots of people to curtail their stress. Too much of everything is bad for people, therefore it is unethical to say that television is making people lazy and distracting them from real world lives.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of television is vast. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable invention.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58122743682 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15112207093 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646209386282 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4464299187 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.833333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117834830858 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419351821887 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259956770442 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682523782858 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287492622259 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.