Consumer should avoid over packed products.
Today, over packaged products are flooding the markets. Since over packaging the consumers as well as environment, there is an urgent need to reduce its usage. It is believed It is responsibility of producers to shun such techniques. This will shown amazing cost saving and curtailing environment.
To begin with, Over Packing often shoots up product price significantly. This means less packaging will be pull cost down. For Example, McDonald packs their burgers in paper wrap and then in card board and then hand it’s me to costumer in a paper bag. As a result, If McDonald will reduce their packing and put only on box then they will sell in low cost. When looking of this example it is obvious that responsible step of producers to cut down price.
In addition to this, over packaging is major catalyst for environment damage as it increased Co2 emission. So it is producer’s responsibility to minimum harm to the ecosystem. For instance, Box packaging cost tree which not only cost of buyer and seller but the whole planet. So it is the best interest for everyone to reduce usages of packaging. This clearly those manufacturers should avoid packaging of good.
This analysis establishes that cost saving and curtailing environment damage is mutually profitable. In a nutshell, it is producer’s responsibility to avoid excess packaging by taking necessary steps.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
2024-02-06 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
2021-12-01 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
2021-05-23 | hang9815 | 72 | view |
2021-02-10 | honorrr | 88 | view |
- Consumer should avoid over packed products. 69
- Whether design of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on peoples life and work? 55
- global warming 77
- Marketing strategy for big companies 55
- n education system, assessment through written formal examinations is valid or not.ORDo you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'show' or 'be shown'?
Suggestion: show; be shown
...cers to shun such techniques. This will shown amazing cost saving and curtailing envi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on box then they will sell in low cost. When looking of this example it is obvious t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13716814159 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04149713661 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601769911504 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4978297564 50.4703680194 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.5625 104.977214359 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.125 20.9669160288 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15538974807 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048926819165 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583658056942 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867256641128 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236981545893 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 69.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 62.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.