Discuss any new technological development in the recent years which is a boon or curse for the society.
Nowadays, the advancements in technology have attracted many controversies and drawn attention from the public. Some people claim that they have made their lives easier, while on the other hand, stands a perspective that they have adversely affected their social well-being. This essay will elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various ways how these technological advances like computers with the internet have positively influenced the lives of the people. The conspicuous one is that these advances have made interactions among the people easier and instant. As an illustration, the internet has paved a way for the people to communicate free of cost with their distant friends and relatives on Facebook, Skype and zoom. Thus, computers and the internet are a new phenomenon which has drastically changed lives of the people.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of these technological developments. The most alarming one is that people are now addicted to these new devices like computers and smartphones that they no longer interact with the people in real. Moreover, people are glued to the screens all the time which have adversely affected their health including back pains and the eyesore. Hence, this shows that the technology has negative consequences on humanity.
In the view of the arguments outlined above, the impact of the technological developments is prominent although they have some minor drawbacks which can be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91578307157 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559183673469 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4085975491 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111763893902 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459351579197 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371034933719 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755004309069 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353509733874 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.