Do you agree that privatization of public sector undertakings is beneficial to society

Essay topics:

Do you agree that privatization of public sector undertakings is beneficial to society?

Recently the phenomenon of privatization of public sector undertakings and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the matter of benefit to societies is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that agreeing with personalization can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, beneficial societies can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits, as well as advantages of privatizing public sectors, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of undertakings. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of social benefits and the role of general units are visible.
Within the realm of science, the relationship between privatizing of public sector undertakings and social benefits that can provide communities with negative impacts that are related to the demerits of society management are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has described the role of the public sector requirement. Hence, predicted outcomes of societies' benefits are presumed.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of striking a balance between the privatization of public sector undertakings and benefits to society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of generalization prove the significance of private society, but also pinpoint the possible implications.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77290836653 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39509093166 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577689243028 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5615449374 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.727272727 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374896919301 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119784806495 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819035857929 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213728529615 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315925156382 0.0609392437508 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.