Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of extreme sport is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that extreme activities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, sport background can provide the society with some noticeable effects rooted in the fact that merits of activity achievement, as well as dangerous issue, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered sport problems. Thus, beneficial ramifications of extreme skiing apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, extreme skiing might increase the consequences of sport problems. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of high-risk activities could be related to the demerits of sport injuries. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of sport issue is correlated negatively with activity changes. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of dangerous activities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of dangerous activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of extreme sports prove my point of view, but also they pinpoint sports problems implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64347826087 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18336888046 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64347826087 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2301893068 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189685236054 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714456392616 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355048226429 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117873409012 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140941770468 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.