Do you think card less society is realistic and why? what are the advantages and disadvantages

In the last decade, the phenomenon of a cardless society has sparked heated debate and the moot question whether this notion is realistic has surfaced. Some believe that it is impractical and even impossible for the economy to operate without the usage of cards while others maintain that it is doable and beneficial. I am inclined to believe that a card-less society is definitely not realistic and will elaborate with examples throughout this essay.

At the outset, there are numerous advantages to a card transaction system. The most conspicuous one would be that people will not need to carry large amounts of cash risking robbery and even death. Additionally, cash transactions which used to take ages can now be done within seconds using this system. Similarly, economists have asserted that not business have not only flourished locally but also internationally due to this convenience.

On the contrary, this card system comes with several drawbacks especially when users do not have complete understanding on how to utilize it. Consequently, these users fall prey to cyber fraud where scammers would rob them of their hard earned money. As an example, a person imposing as one of our company suppliers requested for us to make future payments to a different bank account. Without any suspicion, the accountant did as she was told only to realize that it was a fraudulent account after it was too late. Technology university professor have cited that cyber crimes have increased 320% and is still on the rise largely due to the introduction of card system.

According to the aforementioned arguments, becoming cashless brings in just a few disadvantages, but if people stay more conscious, they can avail a plethora of its advantages. In a nutshell, a card-less society is definitely unrealistic.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, second, similarly, so, still, while, as to, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17006802721 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.985844401 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646258503401 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0424331047 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147930720392 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562757684504 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743618884918 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886206009539 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515424437427 0.0609392437508 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.