There is no doubt that people can learn many useful skills from sports regardless individually or in a team. Some argue that people should participate in them as individuals while others feel that they should do it together in teams. Personally speaking, I am inclined to believe that both types of participation would be beneficial and will provide examples to support my points.
On the outset, individual participation may seem far more advantages due to the fact that athletes have more direct control over their own results. Unlike working in teams, individual athletes can easily determine areas of improvement and focus energy and effort in those aspects. This is reinforced by a research conducted by Harvard University that 60% of athletes choose to face challenges individually because they feel that they can effectively solve those problems with their strong bodies. Evidently, it is true that athletes are able to develop useful skills from individual participation in sports.
On the other hand, team sports helps an individual much more than the physical aspects alone. It builds character, teacher and develops strategic thinking, analytical thinking and leadership skills. Indeed, some could have no opportunities to develop such skills if not for their team participation in sports. For instance, my netball team was able to win the game because of the synergy within the team and the outstanding cooperation skills.
In view of the arguments above, one can conclude that both team and individual sports are effective in the development of useful skills and should consider participating in both types in order to develop them to the fullest.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, while, for instance, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30188679245 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86985039607 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592452830189 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1742731387 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235288513793 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882109809473 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808114368137 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146416188778 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825895349307 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.