Do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages

Essay topics:

Do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages

Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people has changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals cashless society has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussions. People have always hold some conflicting views regarding the effects of cashless society. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument.
Undeniably, cashless society has myriad benefits. Firstly, we don't have a burden of carrying bundle of note with us. We can pay any sum of money with just one scratch of our cards. Secondly, there is no risk and worries of losing our cash. This is because, even if we lost our credit cards, anonymous cannot use them and we can also even reissue them from a respective banks. Lastly, paying through cards provides us with extra discount bonus which is not available in cash payment.

However, there is no doubt cashless generation is suitable for only educated groups. The reason for this that, poor and uneducated people are not aware of the use of online payment. Therefore, they can be easily duped by anyone. Also, credit card payment is not suitable for small payments as their is also limit attached to number of transaction which can be done in a single day.

To conclude, we cannot deny that cashless society don't prove to be beneficial for below poverty line individuals. However, in my opinion, cashless society has many advantages on which behalf its negative impacts can be overlooked.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-21 Rafia Jawad 75 view
2024-08-15 Rafia Jawad 88 view
2024-08-12 Rafia Jawad 85 view
2024-06-11 Sridarani 77 view
2024-04-28 topraveesh 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user jaideep singh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'held'.
Suggestion: held
...mporary discussions. People have always hold some conflicting views regarding the ef...
^^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ociety has myriad benefits. Firstly, we dont have a burden of carrying bundle of not...
^^^^
Line 2, column 369, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'bank'?
Suggestion: bank
...lso even reissue them from a respective banks. Lastly, paying through cards provides ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...t is not suitable for small payments as their is also limit attached to number of tra...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e, we cannot deny that cashless society dont prove to be beneficial for below povert...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, no doubt, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94758064516 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57849898156 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637096774194 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9745382101 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6875 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101002896136 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375753979151 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552123226489 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070523996273 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525187567906 0.0609392437508 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 12.6369458128 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 74.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.