Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, overpackaging has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “who is responsible for this?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that producers must remain liable for this issue, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, overpacked products are bound up inextricably with cutting down trees, which indicates they lead to both global warming and carbon dioxide. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between overwrapping and greenhouse gasses as well as an exponential increase in pollution. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of overpackaging is correlated positively with not only customers but also producers.
Within the realm of economic, without the slightest doubt, extra packaging attribute to over cost, in that it would come down to wasted money, less profit, and household costs. A salient example of such attribution is luxurious, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take disposable packaging for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint producer problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of overpackaging.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that companies must remain accountable for overpackaging. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81588447653 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31920747164 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703971119134 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1713583828 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.923076923 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110667917597 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0302851166416 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248368583991 0.071462118173 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589051162121 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129959061136 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.12 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.