Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of parent’s responsibility for the behavior of their children and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of parental accountability is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being morally responsible can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the responsibility of parents for their children’s behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that correcting behavior, as well as a reasonable care, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered being a leader. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being legally liable and teaching social behavior apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of poor upbringing, parents not holding responsibility for their children’s behavior might increase the consequences of committing a crime. Moreover, fundamental aspects of imitating parent’s action relate to this reality that the demerits of observing parents pertain to being influenced by them. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of aggressive behavior is correlated negatively with a troubled childhood. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of shaping kid’s behavior.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of parents being responsible for their kids’ behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of developing skills prove the significance of responding to discipline, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86785714286 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45606351215 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3736502142 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.916666667 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258183712815 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962538499216 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822637457802 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165744907759 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017880206192 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.