Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged product or it is the responsibility of producers?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals over packaged product has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analysis and explain whether government should abolish the use of packaged materials or individual should halt themselves. I will discuss this topic in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad troubles of using polythene covered material. The first and foremost, it released the environment problems which harm to health of masses. To cite an example, there are a lot of packaged which are not recycled and people throw everywhere. Moving further, it is also difficult to decompose like people have to burn these polythene otherwise it pollute the flora and fauna due to this, individuals have to suffer some kinds of ailments.
On the contrary, to address this problem, authorities should aware people about the harmful effect of over use of packaging things. What is more, customers should reuse polythene when they go for shopping it seems to be more beneficial as we may save money as well as environment.
To conclude, I firmly believe, both buyer and producer has responsibility to avoid over packaging. However, according to my perspective, it is also duty of government to create some policy against the usage of over packaging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this polythene' or 'these polythenes'?
Suggestion: this polythene; these polythenes
...t to decompose like people have to burn these polythene otherwise it pollute the flora and faun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pollutes'?
Suggestion: pollutes
...ve to burn these polythene otherwise it pollute the flora and fauna due to this, indivi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16239316239 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82656692913 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7999118165 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185288583141 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0622013744661 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733908695611 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10671504481 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545433164345 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.