Do you think the significance of English language as an international language will be lost
with globalisation or its significance will increase with globalisation?
What is your opinion?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the usage of English language
in almost every part of the world, thanks to globalisation. There is a widespread worry that increased
exposure of other languages and cultures will threaten the dominance of English language. In my opinion,
this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that thanks to
globalisation, the interaction between people from different languages and diverse cultural backgrounds
will inevitably increase. As English is already the most widely used language throughout the world, not only
will it help people to communicate effectively with each other, but it will also be embraced by more and
more people. Needless to say, this universal appeal of English will keep it in a preponderant position, as far
as gaining more popularity is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that now English is the language of Science, Commerce, trade,
arts, history, literature, media, entertainment and what not. Unlike in the past, when the world was not
much connected without a common language and so it was next to impossible to keep abreast with the
latest happenings, nowadays English has helped mankind overcome all communication barriers. Hence, the
likelihood that English will thrive, flourish and spread rapidly is very high.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the apprehension that English language
will lose its value because of globalisation is ungrounded indeed.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-05-03 | ananddeepsingh | 77 | view |
2018-02-17 | jasim93 | 77 | view |
2018-01-23 | akifkhan | 77 | view |
2017-03-23 | jasminegautam | 77 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Advantages Disadvantages of Cashless Society 86
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 72
- Does television remove loneliness or not 82
- Some people believe that technology has made man more social To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...d so should be rejected. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4296875 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01986222717 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58203125 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4115942002 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.363636364 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.12807881773 412% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296789236127 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106242779247 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618261327908 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856281742198 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617770450247 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.