Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the advantages and disadvantages of video calls among doctors and patients to diagnose a disease. Some people think that video calling can act as a benefitial tool between doctors and patients, while others maintain that a disease cannot be accurately diagnosed via video calls. This essay will discuss the disadvantages of video calling in medical domain to cure a disease.
At the outset, there are myriad of negative arguments associated with use of video call between doctors and patients. Firstly, the most conspicuous is the right diagnosis of the disease. Medicine is a profession which not only entails direct interaction between doctor and patient but also requires close visual physical inspection of the disease or wound. For instance, a dermatologist cannot write his opinion about a skin disease until physical examined and checked. As a result, it is quite evident that diseases cannot be accurately diagnosed on video communication.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is excessive time consumption in accurate diagnosis. At times, for right and timely diagnosis doctors need to check up other vitals which require specialized medical apparatus, for example, a stethoscope or BP machine to inspect the chest congestion or blood pressure. As a matter of fact, video calls are not at all feasible for accurate and timely medical diagnoses as diagnosis can get delayed if a doctor needs to check a patient using other medical equipment.
To recapitulate, aforementioned discussion propounds that video calling between doctors and patients has more disadvantagess than advantages as physical inspection and checkup by ancillary equipment cannot be carried out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- environment pollution. 75
- Some people think that thinking about the future and planning for the future is to be a waste of time. They should simply live in a present moment. Do you agree or disagree? 71
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 45
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 55
- ‘Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.’ 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ately diagnosed on video communication. On the other hand, another pivotal facet...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...patient using other medical equipment. To recapitulate, aforementioned discussi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, while, for example, for instance, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46570397112 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95651780593 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6611726351 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191661127116 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769750490206 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454923577788 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12488817335 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471882507246 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.