Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? What are the pros and cons?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals video communication help patients has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always held some conflicting views in this issue. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument.
To begin with, there are myriad merits of video communication. The first and foremost, it is very effective in emergency situation because it is good way to come out in a case of emergency. Probing further, individuals can get advice from reputed doctors and hospitals. As a case in point, parents are worried about health of their kids so they can communicate any time without any trouble.
On the contrary, every rose has its own thorns so there are some pitfalls of it. Firstly, internet facilities are not available in some backward or rural areas. Therefore, masses have to face problems. Moreover, patient and doctor may have miscommunication and misunderstanding of symptoms while curing certain maladies.
To conclude, advancement in automation has changed our life properly. So, video communication is also best source for getting rid of ailments. According to my perspective, authority should provide internet facility in backward areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 210.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29047619048 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02656792071 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0951084988 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.0666666667 104.977214359 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.9669160288 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176858535869 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455208825053 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060409015455 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874286934086 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293266459242 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.