Due to cities expanding, governments should create better more public transport networks for everyone rather than build more roads for vehicle owning population. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give the reasons of your opinion.

Essay topics:

Due to cities expanding, governments should create better more public transport networks for everyone rather than build more roads for vehicle owning population. To what extent do you agree with this statement? Give the reasons of your opinion.

Nowadays, increased population in urban areas has forced cities to continue to expand. Some people argue that governments should create better more public transport networks instead of building more rods for private cars. Personally, I tend to agree with this argument from social and environmental perspectives.

To start with, building better public transport networks, such as increasing the number of runs for buses or trains, can easily achieve the goal of relieving the traffic congestion during rush hour, which building more roads cannot. This is especially true when we consider the fact that a huge amount of money building roads cost. Other measures including adding new stands in population intensive districts and planning better connect between different means of transportation could also make citizens’ life more convenience.

Furthermore, it is worthwhile to mention that improving public transfer network can contribute to environmental protection. It is generally believed that using private vehicles causes much more green-house gas emission than public transports. For example, more fuels would be consumed if everyone drives cars. Therefore, developing public transportation will benefit cities in a sustainable way.

In conclusion, there are various arguments to support the idea of building a better public transport system including social reasons and environmental reasons, which I strongly agree with. According, it is suggested that governments should allocate more funds on it than building roads for private cars.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-07 adrian 77 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user adrian :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sustainable way" with adverb for "sustainable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...blic transportation will benefit cities in a sustainable way. In conclusion, there are various ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84210526316 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97138036305 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662280701754 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7976460845 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406457862711 0.242375264174 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136442515419 0.0925447433944 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901264896113 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254824717829 0.151781067708 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489557123271 0.0609392437508 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.