It is important to preserve both the cultural and environment of the place you visit, but some people think it is important to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree??
The most conspicuous treads of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people think that tourists are responsible to preserve both cultural and environmental places. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, I do not entirely accept this, and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that to preserve both the cultural and environment of the places you visit, which can not only contribute to provide a positive impact on people mind but also enhance the tourism and effect directly on country economy. Thanks to the wide range of advantages being offered by to preserve both the cultural and environment of the places, which can not only provide one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but also enhance the productivity and standard of their life, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead. as far as augmenting their chances of a better life is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, one broaden their horizons. Thus learning such essential attributes as responsibilities and dedication. Hence, It is apparent why many are in favor of to preserve both the cultural and environment of the places.
To conclude that, the benefits to preserve both the cultural and environment of the places you visit is indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, I do not entirely accept...
^^^^
Line 2, column 661, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...l these merits stand one in good stead. as far as augmenting their chances of a be...
^^
Line 2, column 661, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l these merits stand one in good stead. as far as augmenting their chances of a be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78640236858 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531135531136 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.166422926 50.4703680194 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.25397266985 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250420073419 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799465019901 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974661428286 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166629475552 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733210329309 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.