Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.' To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
In this day and age, it is a point of contention whether environmental problems should be managed by individuals or it can be resolved at government level. While there are certainly valid arguments to claim that it would be addressed by authorities, yet I still believe that both sides are responsible in this regard to some extent. The principal reasons associated with this idea are as follows.
Firstly, all sorts of emissions would be controlled by both officials and every member of the public. As an example, greenhouse gases, which are lead to increasing the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere, is produced by carbone dioxid from factories and vehicles alike. Additionally, lacking of monitoring, organizations and every members of society play a prominet role to make contribution to the development of this problems by a few preventative measures. Thus, this makes it clear that why it is be accompanied by both sides as mutual relationship to address environmental disasters.
secondly, another major contributing issue is the impact of humans on the environment. An outstanding and notable instance to illustrate this is deforestation resulting in the extinction of many species of anilmals and plants in the blink of an eye. In other words, when it comes to environmental degredation natural areas and wild animals are at risk of extinction because of human activity. After analyzing this, it is evident that something must be done by governments and ordinary people to protect such invaluable resources.
As seen above, my personal sentiment is that each and every individual may incline to views this matter differently, but I do hold the belief that had individuals and officials had more positive and mutual relationship, they would have been more successful for implementing novel approaches in order to tackle major and serious environmental issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-21 | mojtaba1980 | 85 | view |
| 2018-07-12 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 88 | view |
| 2018-07-02 | Muhammad Ishaq | 72 | view |
| 2018-03-29 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
| 2017-12-13 | mojtaba1980 | 80 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What’s your opinion? Good or bad? 11
- Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.' To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own exp 77
- Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.' To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own exp 86
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...hus, this makes it clear that why it is be accompanied by both sides as mutual rel...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... to address environmental disasters. secondly, another major contributing issue is th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'view'.
Suggestion: view
...ach and every individual may incline to views this matter differently, but I do hold ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3322147651 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21215969579 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9461847305 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.416666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240148496296 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821692378395 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787620769334 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137345757941 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926695333605 0.0609392437508 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.