Experience is the best teacher. Some people believe it is more effective than formal school study and books, what do you think?
Studying in books only is not sufficient, practical experience is required to get a better picture. Some people believe in this notion while others argue that conventional education of books is more effective in learning. This essay will discuss how having an experience is a better way to learn.
To begin with, studying books can help in getting initial information about a subject but to get a clearer view of the subject experience is required. For example, when an engineer starts practice engineering, he might even learn from a layman who is uneducated but have experience in the field. In some cases, they give better solutions than the fresh engineers when an issue is faced at site. Therefore, experience is more necessary in these fields.
Secondly, formal education will only teach some basic concepts while practice will improve its understanding. Further it helps in understanding the complexity of a concept and in depth details. For instance, learning to use a vernier caliper by reading in a book is less helpful as compared when it is used in a physics laboratory by physically using them to measure different objects. Hence, seeing the implementation of any concept practically is more beneficial to to learn anything for a longer period of time.
In conclusion, traditional studies may be helpful in developing initial concepts but in my opinion experience is a better teacher.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... concept practically is more beneficial to to learn anything for a longer period of t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...icial to to learn anything for a longer period of time. In conclusion, traditional studies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14410480349 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97373820866 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615720524017 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4003884159 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 7.25397266985 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216632826683 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784021845212 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632915419013 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133493942672 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635286367069 0.0609392437508 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.