Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. To what extent do you agree with opinion?

Essay topics:

Experience is more effective and useful than books and formal education. To what extent do you agree with opinion?

it is irrefutable to say that practical learning is least preferred than theoretical learning. Nowadays, the phenomenon of practical experience and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Considering this, some analyst believe that in comparison to formal education, practical could bring many benefits for both society and educational system. I profoundly believe that just learning books can never construct an individuals’ life better. this essay will give assertion on both sides and deliver a plausible conclusion.

From the educational standpoint, formal teaching is the root of learning methods. it teaches society some basics in learning with positive impacts. From my own experience, when I was a college student, I performed an academic survey about education methods which revealed that using books and documents were still popular among authorities. Furthermore, the conspicuous reason is that young juvenile has to learn through books before attaining any practical experiments.

On the other hand, today science has achieved great exposure through humongous technological developments. learning new skills just based on formal and theoretical education method might increase the detrimental effects of non-experienced educated people. Moreover, fundamental aspects of experimental education prepare graduates with so many useful knowledge which could not be achieved by just theoretical learning. According to academic research conducted by Indian University, those students having at least 30% practical courses are well-educated than their counterparts. practical education and experience helps student to acquire reliable and better career in specific industrial prospects.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents tend to believe that formal education with some books and academic resources is enough for students to be prepared, I strongly tend to believe that practical education has many advantages which outweigh its disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-06-25 sneha.jadhav 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is irrefutable to say that practical le...
^^
Line 1, column 461, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...truct an individuals' life better. this essay will give assertion on both sides...
^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...aching is the root of learning methods. it teaches society some basics in learning...
^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Learning
...h humongous technological developments. learning new skills just based on formal and the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much useful knowledge', 'a good deal of useful knowledge'.
Suggestion: much useful knowledge; a good deal of useful knowledge
...tal education prepare graduates with so many useful knowledge which could not be achieved by just the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Practical
... well-educated than their counterparts. practical education and experience helps student ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, well, as to, at least, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04561403509 5.00649968141 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16283045079 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635087719298 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5679838046 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.866666667 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12942443694 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042910039236 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0201025907362 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808091281483 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00831467470353 0.0609392437508 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.81 11.5310837438 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.