Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.

Although such topic, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on whether the experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books can lead to thought-provoking discussion. My view is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exist on either side, with the experience a person can do things in a better way. In this essay, I shall present my view points and calculation by considering both sides of the argument.

There are a number of reasons in favor of my viewpoint. One of them is that, with the more experiences, a person can easily predict the future and able to take actions accordingly. It can be also observed that people with the huge amount of experience can not only share his experiences with the people globally via various means like the publication of books, uploading videos on You-tube, and conducting seminars but he also learns new things from other. Thus, learning from experience is rightly justifies.
There are a few aspects of learning from experience that needed special mentioning. Firstly, if a person fails in a particular thing then rather than being disappointed he should recall the past like what the things are going wrong and consult respective people who have been passed from that situation and take appropriate actions to achieve the goal. Thus, learning from experience is truly justified.

I see there is potential evidence to support my viewpoint I have provide and hence my view is that experience is the greatest teacher in person’s life, from which a person can do the things in a better way.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...Although such topic, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 66, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...evidence to support my viewpoint I have provide and hence my view is that experience is...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rson can do the things in a better way.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, then, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00373134328 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92986965954 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578358208955 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.1404763271 50.4703680194 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.909090909 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184378025919 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721230031841 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085699757754 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110166335311 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807876445429 0.0609392437508 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.