Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of educational achievement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that Academic qualification market can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, formal education can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of well-rounded education, as well as conventional education, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both learner’s performance and educational facilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning environment software might increase the consequences of theoretical knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of training courses is correlated negatively with the learning disorder. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational perspective.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of informal learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational strategies prove the significance of fastest learning environment, but also pinpoint excellent books implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution? 85
- Whether design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? give your opinion. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the fastest'.
Suggestion: of the fastest
...ional strategies prove the significance of fastest learning environment, but also pinpoint...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10671936759 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51850594412 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671936758893 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0995289526 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0452768448665 0.242375264174 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0139780935538 0.0925447433944 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200191443951 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.02419983507 0.151781067708 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156606765798 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.32 53.1260098522 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 11.5310837438 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.