As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks?
All Nation are induced in multinational trade methodology due to essential requirements. The globalization changes which minimize the distances between the countries by trade, it has done as per the budget of nation. When during trade there is positive and negative aspect but we consider which one is important. My point of view, there is more benefits in advantage than disadvantage.
So, in India 50 years back we can’t get goods from another part of nation but today we can get whatever. For instance, India import jack fruit form USA, now in India jack fruits available in any place. Even though still unaware of some products in another nation because of long distance transport.
Moreover, trade which help the growth of national economy then it provides employment, some small-scale entrepreneurs can expand their business globally and trade which maintain peace between two nations.
On another hand, while trade it makes some problem. For example, in India import foreign product, so the people like foreign good more than traditional which impact in the culture changes. Secondly, the major disadvantage of import goods it increases the exhaust pollution because of rod, sea, air transport.
In conclusion, trade have more merit and demerit but product outweigh consider to important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are more benefits'?
Suggestion: there are more benefits
...ich one is important. My point of view, there is more benefits in advantage than disadvantage. So, in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on because of long distance transport. Moreover, trade which help the growth of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 206.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34466019417 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75270113874 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660194174757 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 379.143842365 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6639203517 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124446003882 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470781439571 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280763662719 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703145521544 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018307261543 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.