government to allow road vehicle

Essay topics:

government to allow road vehicle

The importance of governments build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the letter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that governments build more roads to allow for vehicle. Consequently, governments duty to more people provide to public transport. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that government roads facilities provide to people because no chance accident. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.

Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that governments more roads to allow highway railways and etc. Besides, the governments vehicle owner of improve the public transport. Hence, it is apparent why many are against favor of this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of governments build more roads to allow more vehicle improve the public transport are indeed too great dire to ignore. The importance of governments build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the letter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that governments build more roads to allow for vehicle. Consequently, governments duty to more people provide to public transport. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that government roads facilities provide to people because no chance accident. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.

Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that governments more roads to allow highway railways and etc. Besides, the governments vehicle owner of improve the public transport. Hence, it is apparent why many are against favor of this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of governments build more roads to allow more vehicle improve the public transport are indeed too great dire to ignore.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-25 Rafia Jawad 11 view
2024-02-15 Hasnain 77 view
2024-02-05 topraveesh 85 view
2023-08-17 Bilal620 80 view
2023-08-17 Bilal Khalid 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ts more roads to allow highway railways and etc. Besides, the governments vehicle owner ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... highway railways and etc. Besides, the governments vehicle owner of improve the public tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ts more roads to allow highway railways and etc. Besides, the governments vehicle owner ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... highway railways and etc. Besides, the governments vehicle owner of improve the public tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 20.9802955665 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 31.9359605911 188% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2489.0 1207.87684729 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 474.0 242.827586207 195% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25105485232 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 3.92707691288 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74120703827 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.274261603376 0.580463131201 47% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 777.6 379.143842365 205% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 8.0 1.56157635468 512% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 12.6551724138 190% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4912432946 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.708333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70833333333 7.25397266985 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 6.9802955665 258% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328992897574 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124344178966 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11431715798 0.071462118173 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256898218215 0.151781067708 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554699995803 0.0609392437508 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.32886699507 78% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.