Government should promote public transport or build new road.
The importance of public transport which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial which others reject this notion. The substantial influence of hustle and bustle on the road due to over population has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend in the recent years. In my opinion, former one appears to be more rational. This essay will elaborate my reasons of following this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion, in the upcoming paragraphs.
There are myriad of reasons which will explain this argument, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that pollution, as can be seen that if government will build the new road then vehicles will simultaneously increased on the road which lead to air pollution. As a ramification, it is the major cause of various diseases. Moreover, if all people will used their individual car then consumption of the fossil fuels will be increased, due to which future generation face the deficiency of fossil fuels. Hence, it is ostensible from the above, why many people assert that government should promote public transport instead of new road construction.
However there are some pitfalls that negate this argument, but the crucial one is that some time public transport not offer comfort services and most of the time people get late when they travel by public transport.
After hashing out the aforementioned deliberation, as one can reach a conclusion that the merits of public transport are instrumental indeed. Never the less, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2024-02-15 | Hasnain | 77 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal620 | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal Khalid | 80 | view |
- Study requires clam, relax and space others think that employment is beneficial with study. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 94
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory.Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? 79
- As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree? 80
- Some people feel that boarding schools is bets options while others reject this discuss both the views. 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
... road then vehicles will simultaneously increased on the road which lead to air pollution...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
... diseases. Moreover, if all people will used their individual car then consumption o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...port instead of new road construction. However there are some pitfalls that negate thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...blic transport are instrumental indeed. Never the less, the potential drawbacks shoul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16349809886 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86206485415 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9136814593 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.454545455 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287905977054 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962221619313 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125605763524 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155755423516 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792852835038 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.