Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree.
The fact that government reducing their investments in art, music and painting was always a debatable topic. Many people argue that it would lead to myriad of concerns. In my opinion, I completely disagree with the statement and this step should be rejected. The following essay would further elaborate the reasons why government should not reduce financial budget of fine arts with clear reasons.
Firstly, one of the main debate going on in today's world is reducing yearly financial budget on fine arts including painting and music by the government. The most important fact is that these various forms of arts are vital for the growth of nation. Government need to support the survival and thrive of these ancient cultures. Music and painting not only induce discipline but can also give them chance to grow in these field nationally as well as internationally.
Secondly, arts have a vital connection with the cultural identity of the nation. If an art disappears, the whole way of life will disappear with it and we will lose the rich cultural diversity. Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that music and painting are two varied medium of expressing the emotions and this sector deserve the investment to acquire desired development. For example, Australian government has invested 30% of its budget to support fine arts in the year 2017. As a result, improvement in people artistic has increased from 10% to 40%. This example clearly exemplifies us why many people are in favor of dedicating the hefty amount of money in fine arts.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that the benefits of investing in the field of art are indeed too good to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 72
- Pros and Cons of extreme or adventure sports? 77
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend to take? 77
- Should government build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 92
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem. What problem will this shortage of time causes. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01403508772 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73357880122 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3330097072 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197656546039 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620865173427 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746708349193 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115021255842 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742847751396 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.