How mass communication influence our lives especially the children. Discuss advantages and disadvantages.
In recent decades, there has been a highly controversial issue regarding advantages and disadvantages of mass communication and its influence on the people specifically children. I firmly concur with the opinion that merits of the communication are the exchanging information in the least amount of time, and drawbacks are distracting the concentration, especially for children.
To begin with, the benefits of communication between people in global scale are exchanging thoughts and feelings with the maximum speed. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further the way people connect with each other. Subsequently, final results revealed the presence of a highly complex relationship between receiving data for schools and homework and teachers even though tutors and students and radio and television and internet should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between obtaining and transferring the data with high efficiency and knowledge in high schools.
Furthermore, the downsides of the communication are distracting the attention of youngsters and they cannot concentrate on their studies. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning the lower grades and declining the spending of study's time. Hence, perhaps if scientific research is inextricably linked with television's programmes and practising the math and reading the books, the preliminary findings will be closely allied with lower grades.
To conclude, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that the mass communication has benefits and downsides such as alleviating the children's concentration and the transforming information in minimum times although the advantages of mass communication outweigh the disadvantages. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should be cognizant of the effect of the mass media on the kids.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 8.36945812808 227% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84563758389 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31405699105 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8733934268 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.363636364 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176478400252 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668758267275 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902845786673 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125756930713 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109169322092 0.0609392437508 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 12.6369458128 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.